Skip main navigation and go to content

ARB Criteria

Contents

Download PDF version of this document PDF Format

Get Adobe Acrobat

These criteria have also been adopted and approved by the Royal Institute of British Architects.

Foreword

The Architects Act 1997 gives the Architects Registration Board (ARB) the responsibility for prescribing the qualifications and practical training experience required for entry onto the UK Register of Architects. The prescription of qualifications is key to ARB’s dual mandate, to protect the consumer and to safeguard the reputation of architects.

In carrying out its duty to prescribe qualifications, ARB publishes criteria, which set out the minimum levels of awareness, knowledge, understanding and ability that students of architecture must acquire at key stages in the process of qualifying as an architect. These criteria form the basis upon which ARB makes decisions as to whether or not qualifications can be prescribed.

The underlying framework for the criteria are Articles 3 and 4 of European Union Council Directive 85/384/EEC, the Architects’ Directive. That Directive sets minimum requirements for the length and core areas of study for architectural qualifications across the European Union. This is to facilitate mutual recognition of those qualifications and to facilitate the right of establishment and freedom to provide services across the European Union. ARB is the Competent Body for the Directive in the UK and as such has responsibility for ensuring that all UK qualifications for the practice of architecture comply with the requirements of the Directive.

These new criteria differ to those previously published in that:

The ARB and the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) have agreed to hold these criteria in common. Their publication would not have been possible without considerable input from a wide range of people and organisations. In particular the Board would like to thank RIBA for its work in helping to establish these criteria. The Board is also indebted to the profession at large who through the market research the Board carried out in August 2001 provided the Board with a powerful insight into how architectural education ought to more positively gear students for professional life. The Board would also like to thank the Standing Conference of Heads of Schools of Architecture for their input to the process, along with those other parties interested in architecture and architectural education who also made submissions helping to ensure that the criteria are both workable, practical and valued by all those who need to use them.

The Board recognises that architectural practice is a complex and changing activity. Architectural education therefore needs from time to time to reflect those changes. The Board would be grateful to receive views from all interested parties on the perceived need for changes in the criteria, including any newer subject areas that have become more important and the omission of any items no longer considered relevant.

The Board is not proposing to make ad hoc changes to the criteria - that would be difficult for the Schools of Architecture to manage - but it does hope in dialogue with them and with RIBA, to ensure the criteria remain a live topic that all can share in updating and improving from time to time for the benefit of architectural education, its students and the profession.

Owen Luder, Acting Chairman, April 2002

Top

Introduction

The criteria, below, describe the requirements for the prescription of Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3 qualifications in architecture by the Architects Registration Board. The criteria incorporate the relevant requirements of the UK Quality Assurance Agency (QAA) and EU Directive and are considered under five thematic headings: Design, Technology and Environment, Cultural Context, Management Practice and Law, and Communication. No weightings are given to the separate themes with the exception of Design, which is to constitute at least half of assessed work at Part 1 and Part 2.

Students must also be given the opportunity to pursue related, specialised, or optional studies. The form and content of related, specialised and optional studies, are a matter for each institution, and institutions may develop programmes that, for example, link architecture with other subjects, emphasise research, develop specialisms and promote advanced degrees. However, such initiatives must not compromise the key requirement that all students receiving a qualification must meet all the criteria.

This document should be read in conjunction with ‘Prescription of Qualifications: ARB Procedures’ published by the Architects Registration Board in 2003.

Top

Terminology

The terms awareness, knowledge, understanding and ability are used in the criteria to indicate the level of achievement required in each theme and student progression through the course of study. The following guidance is given on the definition of these four terms:

Term Guidance
Awareness acquaintance with general concepts, topics, rules methods or procedures, without necessarily being able to paraphrase or summarise information. Students should be able to identify the limits of their awareness and be able to refer to source material for more in depth knowledge.
Knowledge familiarity with specific information, including facts, definitions, rules, methods, process or settings, without necessarily being able to see its fullest implication or application.
Understanding identification, assimilation and comprehension of information. Students can correctly paraphrase or summarise information and can relate it to other material, including its practical application.
Ability skill in relating specific information to the accomplishment of tasks. Students can correctly select information that is appropriate to a situation and apply it to the solution of specific problems.

The terms academic portfolio and coherent architectural designs are also used in the criteria.

The academic portfolio is a comprehensive chronological record of a student’s design project work together with all course work, including reports, dissertations, sketch books and any other evidence of work, (with project briefs and examination papers), that have been assessed as part of the course leading to an award of Part 1, 2 or 3. The visiting board will examine the academic portfolios of a representative sample of students in order to gain a clear understanding of student achievement in each year of the course in all subjects, modules and units for each award.

Coherent architectural designs propose qualitative three-dimensional spatial configurations that are well planned and meet user and local needs. There will be progression in complexity from Part 1 to Part 2.

Top

PART 1

DESIGN

At Part 1 students will demonstrate coherent architectural designs that integrate a knowledge of:

And ability to:

TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT

At Part 1 students will demonstrate, within coherent architectural designs and academic portfolio, the ability to integrate knowledge of:

CULTURAL CONTEXT

At Part 1 students will demonstrate within coherent architectural design and academic portfolio awareness of:

Knowledge of:

And ability to:

COMMUNICATION

At Part 1 students will demonstrate within coherent architectural designs and academic portfolio ability to:

MANAGEMENT PRACTICE AND LAW

At Part 1 students will demonstrate within an academic portfolio an awareness of:

A knowledge of:

And ability to:

Top

PART 2

DESIGN

At Part 2 students will produce and demonstrate coherent and well resolved architectural designs that integrate knowledge of:

An understanding of:

And ability to:

TECHNOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT

At Part 2 students will demonstrate, within coherent architectural designs and academic portfolio, the ability to integrate knowledge of:

Understanding of:

And ability to:

CULTURAL CONTEXT

At Part 2 students will demonstrate within coherent architectural designs and academic portfolio understanding of:

And ability to:

COMMUNICATION

At Part 2 students will demonstrate within coherent architectural designs and academic portfolio understanding of:

And ability to:

MANAGEMENT PRACTICE & LAW

At Part 2 students will demonstrate within an academic portfolio knowledge of:

Understanding of:

And ability to:

Top

PART 3

At Part 3 students will demonstrate within an academic portfolio:

THE CONTEXT FOR PRACTICE

Knowledge of:

Understanding of:

Ability to:

THE MANAGEMENT OF ARCHITECTURE

Awareness of:

Knowledge of:

Understanding of:

Ability to:

THE MANAGEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION

Knowledge of:

Understanding of:

Ability to:

PRACTICE MANAGEMENT AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Awareness of:

Knowledge of:

Understanding of:

Approved March 2002
Effective September 2003